AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
August 20, 2003 01:09PM
Dan: Thanks for the feedback on the AR estimation.

Rich: Our local stats expert here just suggested that the Yule-Walker will do just fine for the more general AR process as Dan Rowe indicated. My limited understanding is that AR(1) is sufficient (at least according to a comment made by Keith Worsley at a talk here last month). However, is there an advantage to estimating the autoregression for a lag of greater than 1?

Keith' Worsley's code for his computation of the autocorrelation can be found in the following file:


[www.math.mcgill.ca]

I hope this helps.

Any further info on the number of degrees of freedom consumed by including the AR(1) or higher correction for a time series?

philippe
Subject Author Posted

autoregression/ICA

Philippe Goldin August 07, 2003 01:59PM

Re: autoregression/ICA

Rich Hammett August 07, 2003 02:28PM

Re: autoregression/ICA

Philippe Goldin August 08, 2003 12:51AM

Re: autoregression/ICA

Rich Hammett August 08, 2003 02:17PM

Re: autoregression

philippe goldin August 19, 2003 04:48PM

Re: autoregression

Dan Rowe August 19, 2003 05:12PM

Re: autoregression

Philippe Goldin August 20, 2003 01:09PM