AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
January 10, 2004 09:44PM
Jeremy,

First, your 3dAnova setup sounds correct. You just need to be looking at the interaction term; the ISI (jittered or fixed) X performance (hits or misses). The voxels that are significant for the interaction indicate ones that show hits vs miss activity that is different for jittered or fixed ITI. I believe this is the question you are trying to answer.

Second, to do a conjunction analysis threshold your hits versus misses contrast (paired t-test) for the fixed ISI and for the jittered ISI. This will leave only voxels that show significant differences between hits and misses (use 3dmerge –1thresh option for this). Next turn your fixed and jittered thresholded maps into masks and overlap them using 3dcalc.

3dcalc –a fixed_ISI_thresholded+tlrc –b jittered_ISI_thresholded+tlrc –expr “(step(a))+(2*(step(b)))” –prefix fixed_versus_jittered_conjunction

Above the ‘step’ function creates a mask of all voxels, that is, those that were significant and thresholded with 3dmerge. By adding ‘a’ (fixed ISI) to ‘2*b’ you are creating a conjunction map where voxels that are =1 are those only active for the fixed ISI, those =2 are active for the jittered ISI, and those =3 are active in both ISI conditions. Those =0 are not active in either condition.

Adjust your intensity color bar so that the value 1 gets 1 color, value 2 gets another color, and value 3 gets a third color.

Hope this helps,

Christine
Subject Author Posted

conjunction analysis

Jeremy Purcell January 09, 2004 03:41PM

Re: conjunction analysis

Gang Chen January 09, 2004 08:17PM

Re: conjunction analysis

Jeremy Purcell January 10, 2004 07:30PM

Re: conjunction analysis

Christine Smith January 10, 2004 09:44PM