AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
February 27, 2004 09:50AM
I am trying to find the best way to analyze a block design with the following design:

ABCDABCDABCDABCD

A is a rest, the other are active conditions.

When I convole a canonical HRF with each condition, I note that the HRF for condition B is declining while the HRF for condition C is developing (increasing). This of course creates a non-orthogonal situation, and
would tend to confound the comparison between conditions.

Would 3dDeconvolve object to the non-orthogonality of these reference
vectors?

What is the best way to analyze such a design?

Would a different design be preferable? For example,
ABACADABACAD would allow the HRF to completely resolve during rest
before the active condition.

Thank you,

Lee Friedman

.... but some here don't think this would be an improvement. In this case, the A's would
probably need to be shorter than the other conditions.

I have seen your paper on task block arrangement so I know you have done substantial thinking in this area.

Your thoughts?

Lee
Subject Author Posted

block design with 3 active conditions

Lee Friedman February 27, 2004 09:50AM

Re: block design with 3 active conditions

Gang Chen February 27, 2004 10:23AM

Re: block design with 3 active conditions

Lee Friedman February 27, 2004 02:07PM