History of AFNI updates  

|
July 05, 2004 09:56AM
Hi Gang,

thank you for your prompt reply.
We might try to consider only 15 common levels in a 3dANOVA3, but unfortunately for each subject levels vary from 15 to 22, that's why we would rather use a 2way-ANOVA...
Thanks,
Lorenzo


Gang Chen wrote:

> Hi Lorenzo,
>
> Do those 9 subjects bear the same 15 levels? If so, you'd
> better run 3-way ANOVA with 3dANOVA3 -type 5 so that subject
> variability can be accounted by treating Subject as a random
> factor.
>
> Gang

Subject Author Posted

3dANOVA2 with more then 100 blevels

Lorenzo Sani July 05, 2004 07:17AM

Re: 3dANOVA2 with more then 100 blevels

bob cox July 05, 2004 08:05AM

Re: 3dANOVA2 with more then 100 blevels

Lorenzo Sani July 05, 2004 08:37AM

Re: 3dANOVA2 with more then 100 blevels

Gang Chen July 05, 2004 09:33AM

Re: 3dANOVA2 with more then 100 blevels

Lorenzo July 05, 2004 09:56AM

Re: 3dANOVA2 with more then 100 blevels

bob cox July 05, 2004 02:46PM

Re: 3dANOVA2 with more then 100 blevels

Lorenzo Sani July 06, 2004 07:10AM

Re: 3dANOVA2 with more then 100 blevels

Robert Cox July 07, 2004 09:05AM

Re: 3dANOVA2 with more then 100 blevels

Lorenzo Sani July 08, 2004 03:56AM