AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
July 13, 2004 01:14PM
The partial F corresponding to each stimulus measures whether the whole stimulus is siginificant. In the other words, the partial F value would help answer the following question: if you remove the stimulus from the model, is the added variance by removing this stimulus significant compared to the case with the stimulus in the model? If you have only two lags, the null hypothesis for the partial F is H0: beta0 = 0 and beta1 = 0.

The t value corresponding to each specific lag simply tests whether the coefficient for that lag is significantly different from zero. In the case of beta0 (or beta1), the null hypothesis is H0: beta0 = 0 (or beta1 = 0).

The relationship between partial F and t values is apparent in terms of their null hypotheses: If the partial F is not significant, the two t values would not be significant; However, if either or both t values are not significant, it does not necessarily mean partial F would be insignificant.

Hope this would clarify the diference.

Gang
Subject Author Posted

Partial F's and t values

Michael July 13, 2004 12:57PM

Re: Partial F's and t values

Gang Chen July 13, 2004 01:14PM

Re: Partial F's and t values

Michael July 14, 2004 08:30AM