AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
August 10, 2004 01:02AM
It looks like your slices are probably about 30 degrees from axial, is
that considered "almost axial"?

I'd look very carefully at the coordinates for each slice, or at
least two successive slices. Different scanners seem to stack
oblique slices in different ways.

Let me know if you have any origin problems with the I-files. They are much
more sensible than the DICOM files I've had problems with in the past.
Siemens, for instance, uses a nearly completely different coordinate system for
the funcs than for the anats. At least they appear different, and I haven't
unlocked the secret sines to relate the two reliably for oblique scans.

rich
Subject Author Posted

slice thickess for GE I* files

Alison Adcock August 09, 2004 08:18PM

Re: slice thickess for GE I* files

rick reynolds August 09, 2004 09:20PM

Re: slice thickess for GE I* files

Alison Adcock August 09, 2004 10:26PM

Re: slice thickess for GE I* files

Rich Hammett August 10, 2004 01:02AM

Re: slice thickess for GE I* files

Alison Adcock August 10, 2004 01:44PM