AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
January 26, 2005 04:21PM
Hi Jim,

When doing a time shift, all slices are shifted as if they occurred at
the same point in time. Collecting the slices sequentially will not
have an effect on this. If some slices was collected 1.9 seconds after
the time that you are interpolating to, that is how far it will have to be
interpolated.

Let me assume that you have 7 slices, and you want to interpolate
to the time of slice #0.

If your timings are (0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.25, 1.5), then slice 6 will
be interpolated by 1.5 seconds. It does not matter that the slices
are sequential.

Note that the default action is to align the times to the average offset
(5.25/7, or 0.75, in this case). To align with slice 0, use either '-slice 0'
or '-tzero 0'.

- rick
Subject Author Posted

Accomodating sequential slice acquisition and 3dTshift

Jim Bjork January 26, 2005 03:51PM

Re: Accomodating sequential slice acquisition and 3dTshift

rick reynolds January 26, 2005 04:21PM

Re: Accomodating sequential slice acquisition and 3dTshift

Jim Bjork January 27, 2005 11:08AM

Re: Accomodating sequential slice acquisition and 3dTshift

Robert Cox January 27, 2005 11:29AM