AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
March 17, 2005 12:09PM
Dear afni experts:
I am involved in analyzing the data for an experiment with a very unusual
design. Since the design is so different, any advice you might have on how to
analyze the data would be much appreciated. The design is as follows:

Two groups (patients and nonpatients) completed 4 tasks: 6 minutes
baseline(continuous), 24 minutes state induction (continuous), and 6 minutes of a
control task (continuous). One minute of "fixation" followed each of these tasks.
State induction and the control task were counterbalanced in both patients and
controls.

Given this design, we have a few questions:
1) Except for fixation, there was only one on period for each task. Given that,
can we use a 3dANOVA3 -type 5 to analyze the data or must we use a 3dANOVA2
-type 1?
2) Given that state induction is so long, is it possible for baseline to be
longer or shorter than the other time periods in the deconvolve?
3) We are also interested in comparing the early and late time points of state
induction. To do that, is it more appropriate to censor out the middle time
points in state induction or to divide them up into smaller "chunks" even
though they are not independent tasks?

Any insight or advice would be much appreciated. Thanks again!
-Mariko

Subject Author Posted

stats for longer scans

Mariko March 17, 2005 12:09PM

Re: stats for longer scans

Gang Chen March 17, 2005 04:03PM

Re: stats for longer scans

Mariko March 18, 2005 09:18AM

Re: stats for longer scans

Gang Chen March 18, 2005 11:53AM

Re: stats for longer scans

Mariko March 19, 2005 01:32PM

Re: stats for longer scans

Gang Chen March 21, 2005 05:01PM

Re: stats for longer scans

Mariko March 24, 2005 09:37AM