History of AFNI updates  

|
November 03, 2005 01:18PM
> I designed the matrix so those other stimuli would
> be dumped into the baseline, instead of accounted
> for with their own parameter, whereas in the
> individual-item case every stimulus was accounted
> for by a parameter.


Well, believe it or not, whether you treat a regressor as a normal one or banish it to be part of the baseline (a regressor of no interest such as motion parameters) with -stim_base, it really does not matter at all in terms of the regressors you are interested in. The ONLY effect is that you would get a different Full F. The reason is that, either way, you have exactly the same model, and the Full F is calculated as

Reduced model with [Baseline (including regressors of no interest) + Noise) versus (Baseline (including regressors of no interest) + Regressors of interest + Noise)

Therefore the difference is how you group those regressors of no interest in the same model. Try the different approaches and verify whether this is true.

Cheers,
Gang
Subject Author Posted

different approaches to deconvolution / glt

george November 02, 2005 07:12PM

Re: different approaches to deconvolution / glt

Gang Chen November 03, 2005 10:55AM

Re: different approaches to deconvolution / glt

george November 03, 2005 12:23PM

Re: different approaches to deconvolution / glt

Gang Chen November 03, 2005 01:18PM