AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
Jim Bjork
June 05, 2006 12:01PM
OK,

So let's say we have used 3dFDR to calculate a statistical map of q values after its ranking algorithm has had its way with some statistical dataset-- such as a group map of "activations" as detected by a linear contrast.

Could we (i.e. do users) then use this new dataset output as a mask to create a "final" dataset for analysis and reporting which has filtered out from consideration voxels whose absolute q value was below the two-tailed threshold required for p < .05?

An example would be thus:

If 3dDFR were used on the "ConditionA_vs_ConditionB_tlrc" groupwise statistical map

3dFDR -input ConditionA_vs_ConditionB_tlrc[1] -mask_file TLRCgroupmask+tlrc -cdep -prefix FDR_AvsB

to make a map of q-scores "FDR_AvsB"

Would it "be reasonable" for me to then use 3dmerge to make a nice (filtered) map of actual voxel-wise p-values for reporting in a publication, where the possibility of an erroneously-reported "active" voxel has been reduced to P < 0.05?

3dmerge -prefix AvsB_FDRcontrolled -1thresh 1.96 'ConditionA_vs_ConditionB_tlrc[1]'

where 1.96 is the critical value for p < .05 in a two-tailed distribution.

Jim B
Subject Author Posted

3dFDR quesiton

Tony March 17, 2006 08:52PM

Re: 3dFDR quesiton

Gang Chen March 20, 2006 11:21AM

Re: 3dFDR quesiton

Tony March 20, 2006 03:23PM

Re: 3dFDR quesiton

Gang Chen March 20, 2006 04:10PM

Re: 3dFDR quesiton

Tony March 20, 2006 04:23PM

Taking 3dFDR results to the end zone

Jim Bjork June 05, 2006 12:01PM

Re: Taking 3dFDR results to the end zone

Gang Chen June 05, 2006 12:46PM