AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

Previous Message Next Message
Message List New Topic Print View
|
Colm Connolly
May 17, 2006 11:45AM
Thanks for getting back to me so quickly.

rick reynolds wrote:

> Hi Colm,
>
> Yes, the orientation should be deduced from the information in
> the
> header of the DICOM file.
>

That's what I thought. The reason I ask is that I have structural images in ASR but my functional images are in RAS according to 3dinfo. I'm trying to normalise these using fsl's flirt tool but the results coming out of that leave a lot to be desired, to say the least.

I've previously used flirt to normalise (using the single stage process not the two stage which they recommend) both structural and functional with reasonable results. You can see the results in a thread from last week some time.

The only think I can think of that might be causing the crappy results is the difference in orientation of the structural and functional images. I'm just writing an email to the fsl list to ask for advice.

Regards,

Colm.
Reply Quote
RSS
Subject Author Posted

to3d on Siemens ima files

Colm Connolly May 17, 2006 11:26AM

Re: to3d on Siemens ima files

rick reynolds May 17, 2006 11:31AM

Re: to3d on Siemens ima files

Colm Connolly May 17, 2006 11:45AM

Re: to3d on Siemens ima files

rick reynolds May 17, 2006 12:57PM