AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

Previous Message Next Message
Message List New Topic Print View
|
MP Schroeder
June 30, 2008 10:44AM
Hi guys,
I've been using 3dLME a little bit over the last couple of weeks and had a question why the default type of sums of squares is set to SEQUENTIAL as opposed to MARGINAL. On the AFNI website, [afni.nimh.nih.gov], one of the cons listed for Type I sums of squares is its lack of appropriateness for factorial designs. Given that 3dLME is especially equipped at dealing with unbalanced factorial designs and taking the example given on the Linear Mixed-Effects Modeling AFNI site, wouldn't type III sums of squares be better suited?

Thanks!
-Matt

Reply Quote
RSS
Subject Author Posted

3dLME- Sequential v. Marginal

MP Schroeder June 30, 2008 10:44AM

Re: 3dLME- Sequential v. Marginal

Gang Chen June 30, 2008 02:51PM

Re: 3dLME- Sequential v. Marginal

MP Schroeder August 11, 2008 03:45PM

Re: 3dLME- Sequential v. Marginal

Gang Chen August 11, 2008 05:44PM