AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
October 22, 2008 09:07AM
Hi Aditya,

A location within the brain barely ever sees a 6 percent
signal change. To hit 200 means that location is seeing
a 100 percent signal change. So clipping values at 200
should not affect voxels that you care about.

It is done because most datasets are scaled shorts, which
give you about 3 significant digits. With a max of 200,
that gives you maybe 1 place after the decimal.

If the maximum is not capped, it can easily rise into the
thousands at some locations. That can cost you an entire
decimal place of accuracy (or more) to capture those values
that do not even matter. Meaning you would not be able to
store 102.5, it would have to be either 102 or 103. That
amounts to adding artificial noise into your data.

So it is done to preserve the accuracy of short datasets.

Note that afni_proc.py has a -scale_no_max option to turn
off the application of any limit.

- rick
Subject Author Posted

3dcalc for single-subject normalization

Aditya Prasad October 21, 2008 03:16PM

Re: 3dcalc for single-subject normalization

rick reynolds October 21, 2008 06:27PM

Re: 3dcalc for single-subject normalization

Aditya October 22, 2008 01:01AM

Re: 3dcalc for single-subject normalization

rick reynolds October 22, 2008 09:07AM