AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
Lili
December 26, 2008 01:16AM
Hi all,
I have used the 3dTshift commnad to correct the time difference of the slices, and the output made me comfusing...

The command was
3dTshift -verbose -prefix test -TR 2s -tpattern altplus DDr1+orig

the original acquired time was:
++ using tpattern = 0 1.0303 0.0606061 1.09091 0.121212 1.15152 0.181818 1.21212 0.242424 1.27273 0.30303 1.33333 0.363636 1.39394 0.424242 1.45455 0.484848 1.5 1515 0.545455 1.57576 0.606061 1.63636 0.666667 1.69697 0.727273 1.75758 0.787879 1.81818 0.848485 1.87879 0.909091 1.93939 0.969697 s

and the acquired time of the 33rd slice was used as the template.

++ common time point set to 0.969697

The output are:

++ Time series length = 222; FFT length set to 240
++ slice 0: fractional shift = -0.484848
++ slice 1: fractional shift = 0.030303
++ slice 2: fractional shift = -0.454545
++ slice 3: fractional shift = 0.0606061
++ slice 4: fractional shift = -0.424242
++ slice 5: fractional shift = 0.0909091
++ slice 6: fractional shift = -0.393939
++ slice 7: fractional shift = 0.121212
++ slice 8: fractional shift = -0.363636
++ slice 9: fractional shift = 0.151515
++ slice 10: fractional shift = -0.333333
++ slice 11: fractional shift = 0.181818
++ slice 12: fractional shift = -0.30303
++ slice 13: fractional shift = 0.212121
++ slice 14: fractional shift = -0.272727
++ slice 15: fractional shift = 0.242424
++ slice 16: fractional shift = -0.242424
++ slice 17: fractional shift = 0.272727
++ slice 18: fractional shift = -0.212121
++ slice 19: fractional shift = 0.30303
++ slice 20: fractional shift = -0.181818
++ slice 21: fractional shift = 0.333333
++ slice 22: fractional shift = -0.151515
++ slice 23: fractional shift = 0.363636
++ slice 24: fractional shift = -0.121212
++ slice 25: fractional shift = 0.393939
++ slice 26: fractional shift = -0.0909091
++ slice 27: fractional shift = 0.424242
++ slice 28: fractional shift = -0.0606061
++ slice 29: fractional shift = 0.454545
++ slice 30: fractional shift = -0.030303
++ slice 31: fractional shift = 0.484848
++ slice 32: fractional shift = -0
++ Wrote output: ./test+orig.BRIK

I thought that the sampled time of each slice was corrected to the 33rd slice(0.969697s), but from the output, e.g., the first slice was correct to 0.484848s, and other slices was not corrected to 0.969697s either.

Could any one give me some explainations about this problem? Thanks~
Subject Author Posted

question about the output of 3dTshift

Lili December 26, 2008 01:16AM

Re: question about the output of 3dTshift

rick reynolds December 29, 2008 08:53AM

Re: question about the output of 3dTshift

Lili December 30, 2008 05:59AM

Re: question about the output of 3dTshift

rick reynolds December 30, 2008 08:53AM