AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
March 02, 2009 09:09PM
Hi Antonio,

Just to be sure, your want to generate a time series that is
basically noise (meaning that you do not plan to put any signal
in it - reponses to stimuli), is that right?

1. Maybe the blur step is the most (only?) important one.

You could synthesize time shifting (if you do that), but volume
registration (or more like un-registration) seems like it would
be quite difficult. It would be easy to apply motion parameters,
but not so easy to simulate natural subject motion (over a TR).

Of course, that depends on what you want to study. If you just
want Monte Carlo simulations of regression with noise, maybe the
blur operation is all that matters.

2. It might make sense to get the stdev from the residual time
series generated by 3dDeconvolve. It makes sense to me to use
the variance without any signal in it. But perhaps that is not
what you prefer.

3. Start with your original dataset (as -a), but don't use 'a'
in the expression. Then make up the data ('t' means time).

Most data that I see processed is done as scaled shorts. So it
seems quite reasonable to me (for what that's worth).

- rick

Subject Author Posted

make synthetic data

Antonio Gisbert March 01, 2009 05:08PM

Re: make synthetic data

rick reynolds March 02, 2009 09:09PM