AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
May 27, 2009 11:05AM
> is it statistically sound to have 4 task regressors for some participants, and only 3 for others?

If by "statistically sound" you meant at group analysis, this is a relevant issue indeed. If you take both beta and t-statistic for group analysis with 3dMEMA, it should not matter whether you have equal number of time points in the time series for each regressor across subjects or not since the t-statistic automatically contains such information. However, this may become moot if you only take beta values for group analysis with the conventional approach because it carries two underlying assumptions: (1) within-subject variability is mall relative to cross-subject variability; and (2) within-subject variability is about the same across subjects. You might be OK especially with assumption (2) if you have large number of time points in the time points.

Gang
Subject Author Posted

3ddeconvolve regressors

michael May 27, 2009 10:28AM

Re: 3ddeconvolve regressors

rick reynolds May 27, 2009 10:49AM

Re: 3ddeconvolve regressors

Gang Chen May 27, 2009 11:05AM

Re: 3ddeconvolve regressors

rick reynolds May 27, 2009 12:39PM

Re: 3ddeconvolve regressors

Gang Chen May 27, 2009 01:44PM