AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
May 28, 2009 06:14PM
I'd give that a definite maybe. :) It makes sense, but
automation can be dangerous.

This only matters when the outcount value is high but the
motion change is small, say if motion correction could not
improve the image correspondence, but the correspondence
is still bad.

It certainly seems justifiable, but I have not spent enough
time playing with such data to advise one way or the other.

Sorry for the wishy-washy answer... :)

- rick

Subject Author Posted

Censoring Motion Points

Andrew Jahn May 27, 2009 05:16PM

Re: Censoring Motion Points

rick reynolds May 27, 2009 06:00PM

Re: Censoring Motion Points

Andrew Jahn May 28, 2009 04:50PM

Re: Censoring Motion Points

rick reynolds May 28, 2009 06:14PM