Hi Bob,
I have uploaded the input files and Deconvolve script. The output from 3dnvals on the concatenated datasets was 1043. If this is due to correlation like Rick suggests (which seems likely), what options do I have? Eliminating the correlated regressors wouldn't appear to work, and this would seem to invalidate the analysis for this subject.
Your feedback, as always, is greatly appreciated.
-Andrew
P.S. I realize I forgot to include the dfile.rall.1D file, which was used for the motion regressors; would you like me to tar and resend that as well?
