AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
July 08, 2009 05:28PM
Hi Jinny,

To some degree, you should already be removing those clusters,
assuming they do not come from mistakes in processing.

It is common to have small effects outside the brain from things
such as gaussian blurs, ringing effects from blurring with Fourier
interpolation, or ghosting of the data straight out of the scanner.
If the cause seems to come from those things, you are golden. It
is good to see what happens outside the brain in any case, mostly
as a sanity check.

By my statement of "already be removing those clusters", I mean
that when you measure the FWHM blur in the data in order to get
cluster values from AlphaSim, you probably provided a brain-only
mask to AlphaSim. If that is the case, then the assumption is
that you only have data within that mask, i.e. you are already
applying that mask to your data.

In this case, it is appropriate to apply your brain-only mask to
your results even before clustering.

- rick

Subject Author Posted

non-brain activation

Jinny July 08, 2009 04:42PM

Re: non-brain activation

rick reynolds July 08, 2009 05:28PM