AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
October 02, 2009 03:34PM
Hi John,

Wow, that's a big difference between your scanners, though the
drifts in the 750 seem more normal to me.

Bob's 150 rule seems to be pretty good. We actually see a lot
of different data, as we work with people from all over. But
of course, every scanner is different.

It's nice that you are so easily able to test such things there.

- rick

Subject Author Posted

The case against recommended values for polort

John Ollinger September 30, 2009 02:05PM

Re: The case against recommended values for polort

rick reynolds September 30, 2009 05:45PM

Re: The case against recommended values for polort

Gang Chen September 30, 2009 06:27PM

Re: The case against recommended values for polort

John Ollinger October 02, 2009 01:14PM

Re: The case against recommended values for polort

rick reynolds October 02, 2009 03:34PM