AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
Tom C
October 09, 2009 12:28PM
In the past we used older versions of 3dDeconvolve with the -stim_file option, and used -stim_minlag and -stim_maxlag to offset the hemodynamic models. Then, an iterative regression was used to fit the different models to the signals from each participant, and we used the best-fitting model for further analysis. We would now like to switch to using -stim_times, but we're not sure how to offset the model created with one of the 'Rmodels' listed in the help file for the current 3dDeconvolve. We would like to use the recommended -stim_times options, but how can we offset the models created with a TENT or BLOCK function?

Thanks for your help.
Subject Author Posted

-stim_file vs. -stim_times

Tom C October 09, 2009 12:28PM

Re: -stim_file vs. -stim_times

rick reynolds October 09, 2009 02:13PM

Re: -stim_file vs. -stim_times

Tom C October 09, 2009 06:14PM

Re: -stim_file vs. -stim_times

rick reynolds October 09, 2009 06:19PM