AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

Previous Message Next Message
Message List New Topic Print View
|
Alena
November 04, 2009 05:32PM
Hi,

I've run 3dDeconvolve -nodata on my design matrix and I've got the following output:

Signal+Baseline matrix condition [X] (1140x74): 21.9898 ++GOOD
Signal - only matrix condition [X] (1140x56): 16.6828 ++ VERY GOOD
Baseline - only matrix condition [X] (1140x18): 1 ++ VERY GOOD
polort - only matrix condition [X] (1140x18): 1 ++ VERY GOOD
Matrix inverse average error = 6.21835e-16 ++ VERY GOOD
Matrix setup time = 2.07 s

So I was wondering what could be the specific reasons why my "Signal + Baseline matrix condition" is only "GOOD"? And how I can improve it?

Thanks,
Alena.

Reply Quote
RSS
Subject Author Posted

3dDeconvolve output

Alena November 04, 2009 05:32PM

Re: 3dDeconvolve output

Gang Chen November 05, 2009 02:10AM

Re: 3dDeconvolve output

Alena November 05, 2009 12:44PM

Re: 3dDeconvolve output

bob cox November 05, 2009 08:35AM