AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
Daniel Glen
December 16, 2009 01:36PM
"big_move" allows for a two pass alignment in 3dAllineate. The two-pass method is less likely to find a false minimum cost for alignment because it does a number of coarse (blurred, rigid body) alignments first and then follows the best of these coarse alignments to the fine alignment stage. The big_move option should be a relatively safe option, but it adds processing time.

The giant_move option expands the search parameters in space from 6 degrees and 10 mm to 45 degrees and 45 mm and adds in a center of mass adjustment. The giant_move option will usually work well too, but it adds significant time to the processing and allows for the possibility of a very bad alignment.

If your data starts out fairly close (probably the typical case for EPI and anatomical data), you can use the -big_move with little problem. All these methods when used with the default lpc cost function require good contrast in the EPI image so that the CSF can be roughly identifiable.
Subject Author Posted

Co-registration problems

Anita Cservenka December 15, 2009 07:27PM

Re: Co-registration problems

rick reynolds December 16, 2009 01:01PM

Re: Co-registration problems

Daniel Glen December 16, 2009 01:36PM