AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
March 31, 2010 09:14PM
Hello.

What is the default response model if I don't use the option -stim_times?
Without using -stim_times to specify the response models, sometimes I got a regular shape of the IRF (e.g. the center voxel in the attached figure) but more often not. I was wondering whether the irregular IRF shapes were caused by the data itself or partly by the specified response model. It is not clear to me how to use the option -stim_times in 3dDeconvolv and how big difference it can make. What is the guideline to choose a response model (e.g. GAM, TENT, POLY etc.), and how does it matters? Another minor question is, with the stimulus functions given by -stim_file and the value of TR by -TR_times, why 3dDeconvolv still needs to specify input stimulus timing in tname in the option -stim_times. It seems to be redundant information, otherwise I may misunderstand the purpose of this tname file.

There is another relevant question. If the shape of IRF is random in the region of interest, how do we decide the values for -stim_minlag and -stim_maxlag in the formal process?


Zhuang

Subject Author Posted

response models in 3dDeconvolv

Zhuang Song March 31, 2010 09:14PM

Re: response models in 3dDeconvolv

Zhuang Song March 31, 2010 09:16PM

Re: response models in 3dDeconvolv

Zhuang Song March 31, 2010 09:43PM

Re: response models in 3dDeconvolv

rick reynolds April 05, 2010 02:13PM

Re: response models in 3dDeconvolv

Zhuang Song April 05, 2010 09:51PM

Re: response models in 3dDeconvolv

rick reynolds April 06, 2010 09:00AM

Re: response models in 3dDeconvolv

Zhuang Song April 07, 2010 02:24AM