AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
May 29, 2012 10:54AM
First off, none of us AFNI drones have ever seen or tried to analyze data such as you describe, so we don't really have any idea AT ALL if these registration steps will work well enough for your purposes. You need to somehow establish a test-bed system where you know there is "activation" and then see how well you can find it with this approach. In the early days of FMRI, the test-bed systems were motor cortex (finger tapping experiments) and visual cortex (flashing light experiments). We already knew where the primary motor and visual cortexes are, so we could look for signal changes there after processing the data.

Second off, 3dAllineate -nwarp poly9 is experimental, and is quite likely to run amok and mangle your images. You need to carefully examine the output to make sure that the registration worked well. Which is what the last lines of output from 3dAllineate always say! I put that caution there because it is my experience that people assume that software always gives right results, and then bad things happen to them.
Subject Author Posted

Reasonable analysis of data

Matt_McNeill May 25, 2012 01:50PM

Re: Reasonable analysis of data

Bob Cox May 29, 2012 10:54AM

Re: Reasonable analysis of data

Matt_McNeill May 29, 2012 04:20PM