AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
May 15, 2015 06:10AM
hi Christine

I tried this out and found the same problem--if I gave:

3dBlurInMask -FWHM 8 -input epi+tlrc -prefix blur_test -mask test_mask+tlrc

the output dataset is the blurred EPI data within the mask and 0 everywhere else.

for the moment, I think you could use a 3dcalc command to get what you want (the original data everywhere outside the mask and blurred data in the mask) like so:

3dcalc -a your_original_epi_data -b your_blurred_data -c your_mask -expr 'iszero(c) * a + b'

hope this helps

James
Subject Author Posted

3dBlurtoFWHM

Christine Smith May 13, 2015 03:55PM

Re: 3dBlurtoFWHM

rick reynolds May 13, 2015 04:24PM

Re: 3dBlurtoFWHM

Christine Smith May 13, 2015 05:33PM

Re: 3dBlurtoFWHM

Christine Smith May 14, 2015 07:59PM

Re: 3dBlurtoFWHM

jkeidel May 15, 2015 06:10AM

Re: 3dBlurtoFWHM

Christine Smith May 15, 2015 11:29AM

Re: 3dBlurtoFWHM

jkeidel May 15, 2015 11:43AM

Re: 3dBlurtoFWHM

rick reynolds May 15, 2015 12:29PM