AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
June 17, 2015 10:36AM
Dear everyone,

I would like to rerun an SPM analysis with polynomial regressors accounting for slow frequencies instead of SPM's default high-pass filter. As there are different options (e.g. Legendre ones) I would like to rely on some established method, which made me come to AFNI. Unfortunately I have no experience with AFNI, thus a few questions. My session would be < 20 min, suggesting an order of 8 based on 1 +int(dur/150 s).
1) Is this commonly applied or are there instances in one would want to turn to a lower order (and/or turn to other polynomials)? For example in SPM the default cut-off value 1/128 Hz for the Discrete Cosine Transform is appropriate for designs in which there's sufficient signal within the fast frequencies, but one might want to adjust the cut-off in case of long block designs with long intervals between two blocks of the same type in which one would also expect signal in the low frequency range. This should also hold for the polynomial regressors.
2) Are there any additional calculations on the polynomial regressors before they enter the design matrix and/or at a latter step performed automatically in AFNI but possibly not in SPM (e.g. orthogonalization of the regressors, well, Legendre polynomials should be orthogonal anyway)?

Thank you very much!

Best regards,

Helmut
Subject Author Posted

Polynomial regressors to account for slow frequencies

Helmut June 17, 2015 10:36AM

Re: Polynomial regressors to account for slow frequencies

gang June 17, 2015 10:58AM

Re: Polynomial regressors to account for slow frequencies

Helmut June 17, 2015 12:51PM

Re: Polynomial regressors to account for slow frequencies

gang June 18, 2015 11:00AM

Re: Polynomial regressors to account for slow frequencies

rick reynolds June 17, 2015 01:27PM

Re: Polynomial regressors to account for slow frequencies

Helmut June 17, 2015 01:47PM