AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
July 25, 2016 05:05PM
Hello Afni Experts,

1) I was interested in finding out how to save out the residuals of my 3dMVM model. It this possible to do (similar to the -resid in 3dttest++)? I am performing a seed based resting state correlation analysis using age, gender, group and MOCA as between group covariates and do no have any within subject covariates. If it is not possible within 3dMVM, is there another model that is more appropriate for this analysis (ie 3dLME since 3dttest++ won't work in this situation)? Finally, if no residuals can be output by these models, what would be the best "noise" estimate for 3dFWHMx (ie the average of each individuals epits/errts.anaticor files even though it is technically not noise or something else)?

Ideally I want to use this noise/residual term from 3dMVM as an input to 3dFWHMx with the -acf option in order to properly estimate my smoothness, as underlying spatial stucture from 3dMVM output may incorrectly estimate my smoothness. This output would be fed into 3dClustSim in order to estimate the clusterwise extent for given P values.

2) I recently saw an article by Nichols and colleagues which evaluates the validity of clusterwise estimates in FMRI. The conclusion was that alpha <0.05 is not correctly assessed for any p>0.01. Due to limited number of subjects in a study, I could see where using a more liberal p<0.01 and larger cluster extent is appealing. Does the -acf option in 3dClustSim/3dFWHMx address issues raised in this article so that cluster extents calculated at p<0.01 are indeed accurate or do you recommend going to a p<0.005/0.001 in order to address these limitations for limited N (ie 20 per group).

Thanks,
Ajay
Subject Author Posted

3dMVM residual estimates for 3dClustSim?

AjaySK July 25, 2016 05:05PM

Re: 3dMVM residual estimates for 3dClustSim?

gang July 26, 2016 10:49AM

Re: 3dMVM residual estimates for 3dClustSim?

AjaySK July 26, 2016 03:21PM

Re: 3dMVM residual estimates for 3dClustSim?

gang July 28, 2016 09:18AM

Re: 3dMVM residual estimates for 3dClustSim?

AjaySK July 28, 2016 03:45PM

Re: 3dMVM residual estimates for 3dClustSim?

gang July 29, 2016 09:10AM

Re: 3dMVM residual estimates for 3dClustSim?

defenderfer February 11, 2020 09:46AM

Re: 3dMVM residual estimates for 3dClustSim?

jkeidel July 26, 2016 11:46AM

Re: 3dMVM residual estimates for 3dClustSim?

gang July 26, 2016 11:54AM

Re: 3dMVM residual estimates for 3dClustSim?

jkeidel July 26, 2016 11:56AM

Re: 3dMVM residual estimates for 3dClustSim?

gang July 26, 2016 12:17PM