History of AFNI updates  

|
August 09, 2016 01:38PM
With 3dMVM, there's a difficulty in that (at present) it does not write out residuals to be analyzed. If you analyze the statistics sub-brick(s), the ACF will be biased by the presence -- you hope! -- of activations.

One option would be to compute the 3 ACF parameters for each subject's residuals (errts) time series dataset, then take the mean or median of each of these, and use those 3 values in the 3dClustSim -acf run.
Subject Author Posted

3dttest++ -clustsim vs 3dClustSim very different

AjaySK August 03, 2016 01:04PM

Re: 3dttest++ -clustsim vs 3dClustSim very different

AjaySK August 04, 2016 09:53AM

Re: 3dttest++ -clustsim vs 3dClustSim very different

Bob Cox August 08, 2016 10:58AM

Re: 3dttest++ -clustsim vs 3dClustSim very different

AjaySK August 09, 2016 09:54AM

Re: 3dttest++ -clustsim vs 3dClustSim very different

Bob Cox August 09, 2016 11:31AM

Re: 3dttest++ -clustsim vs 3dClustSim very different

AjaySK August 09, 2016 01:00PM

Re: 3dttest++ -clustsim vs 3dClustSim very different

Bob Cox August 09, 2016 01:38PM

Re: 3dttest++ -clustsim vs 3dClustSim very different

AjaySK August 10, 2016 02:44PM

Re: 3dttest++ -clustsim vs 3dClustSim very different

rick reynolds August 10, 2016 03:19PM

Re: 3dttest++ -clustsim vs 3dClustSim very different

AjaySK August 10, 2016 04:23PM

Re: 3dttest++ -clustsim vs 3dClustSim very different

AjaySK August 10, 2016 04:27PM

Re: 3dttest++ -clustsim vs 3dClustSim very different

rick reynolds August 11, 2016 08:17AM

Re: 3dttest++ -clustsim vs 3dClustSim very different

AjaySK August 14, 2016 12:49AM