Hi Emily,

That is correct, presumably, though we differ in the
way the ordering is described in 2 ways. We would say
alt+z uses ordering 0,2,4,1,3,5, rather than 1,4,2,5,3,6.
But they are probably just 2 ways of describing the same
thing.

Your 1,4,2,5,3,6 indices probably mean: "for each slice
position, what temporal position does it come from?" So
the first slice was the first acquired, the second slice
was the fourth acquired, etc.

To understand 0,2,4,1,3,5, first note that we index the
slices as offsets, so they just start from 0. Then it
is just the actual order that the slices were acquired,
i.e. first slice 0, then 2, then 4, then 1, 3 and 5.

That is how we will describe them in general, so it is
important to understand the difference.

Anyway, is that clear? Am I correct in the interpretation
of your description the acquisition order?

- rick