AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
October 06, 2016 09:34AM
Hello AFNI Experts,

I am planning on doing a dynamic resting state functional connectivity analysis. I have a number of questions related to this, bear with me!

1.) The papers that I have read regress CSF and WM as well as bandpass, so I plan on doing example # 11 with afni proc py adding back in the bandpass. Some papers have used used the CONN tool box, which does the bandpass as a second step after regressing out CSF, WM, motion, outliers, etc. Is there an advantage to doing bandpass as a second step or am I okay with keeping it in the first-level regression model?
2.) Is there a way/possible pipeline you might propose for conducting the sliding-window dynamic resting state connectivity analysis using AFNI tools? For example, lets say I wanted to segment the timecourse into 36 s windows, sliding the onset of each window by 18 secs (not sure how to go about this step in AFNI), then make whole brain correlation maps for each time course (which I know there are a number of tools I could use, 3dfim+, 3dTcorr, etc.), Fischers Z transform (easy enough to do with AFNI), then estimate dynamic connectivity by taking the standard deviation in beta values at each voxel (unsure, perhaps a 3dcalc function?)
3.) I am combining two data sets with resting state data. One data set has a 6 minute scan and the other has a 5 minute scan. In the group analysis, I will be conducting a regression analysis, examining whether resting state connectivity is predictive of psychiatric symptoms. Will I run into issues with the data sets having a different length? Is it necessary to truncate the longer scan to make them equal length?

Thanks and sorry for the long message!

Emily
Subject Author Posted

Dynamic Resting State Functional Connectivity

Emily October 06, 2016 09:34AM

Re: Dynamic Resting State Functional Connectivity

Cesar Caballero Gaudes October 07, 2016 04:29AM

Re: Dynamic Resting State Functional Connectivity

rick reynolds October 07, 2016 08:09AM

Re: Dynamic Resting State Functional Connectivity

Emily March 16, 2017 12:08PM

Re: Dynamic Resting State Functional Connectivity

rick reynolds March 18, 2017 08:31PM