History of AFNI updates  

|
May 17, 2017 11:34AM
> do the first 2 subbriks characterize the effect of subject, with the effect of BPRStot REGRESSED OUT?

"Regressing out" is not an accurate description. Instead, as I mentioned in my previous post, the sub-bricks #0 and #1 in your 3dttest++ output are for the intercept 'a' in the model above, which is the group average effect that is associated with the *average* value of X ('bprstot' in your case).

Gang
Subject Author Posted

Whole-brain Multiple Regression in AFNI

James Waltz January 07, 2017 08:55PM

Re: Whole-brain Multiple Regression in AFNI

gang January 08, 2017 07:39PM

Re: Whole-brain Multiple Regression in AFNI

Bob Cox January 09, 2017 06:42AM

Re: Whole-brain Multiple Regression in AFNI

James Waltz May 15, 2017 01:15PM

Re: Whole-brain Multiple Regression in AFNI

gang May 15, 2017 08:58PM

Re: Whole-brain Multiple Regression in AFNI

James Waltz May 15, 2017 09:17PM

Re: Whole-brain Multiple Regression in AFNI

gang May 16, 2017 03:56PM

Re: Whole-brain Multiple Regression in AFNI

James Waltz May 16, 2017 05:17PM

Re: Whole-brain Multiple Regression in AFNI

gang May 17, 2017 11:34AM

Re: Whole-brain Multiple Regression in AFNI

James Waltz May 22, 2017 10:59AM

Re: Whole-brain Multiple Regression in AFNI

gang May 23, 2017 12:06PM

Re: Whole-brain Multiple Regression in AFNI

James Waltz May 23, 2017 05:17PM

Re: Whole-brain Multiple Regression in AFNI

gang May 24, 2017 02:21PM