AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
September 20, 2017 09:31AM
Hi NS,

Looking at the graphs, it is not clear to me what is supposed
to be negative that is showing up positive. For example, both
graphs show a positive response, so they should show strong
positive correlations.

But consider, these correlations should all be 1 or -1, since
they seem to be based on iresp of a fixed shape BLOCK
function. The plots all look *exactly* the same, and the
differences you are seeing are simply truncation errors from
something.

Along those lines, is that cubic detrending in there? The iresp
time series are short, making them more susceptible to
artifacts from something like detrending and computational
truncations. Is one cubic and the other quadratic? Is is hard
to see...

- rick
Subject Author Posted

InstaCorr and FIM Attachments

ns September 18, 2017 06:36PM

Re: InstaCorr and FIM

rick reynolds September 20, 2017 09:31AM

Re: InstaCorr and FIM Attachments

ns September 26, 2017 01:41PM