AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
June 06, 2018 01:30PM
Hi, Sondos-

The heterogeneity of such (esp. since the individual level results are usually quite noisy in FMRI) can make challenges. Note that having different numbers of ROIs won't cause errors in 3dNetCorr or 3dTrackID per se; however, trying to combine matrices of different sizes after those steps would present challenges, indeed. Those analyses are typically based on looking at "connections" between the same two targets across a group (whether those be correlation values or tract-derived estimates); therefore, having different targets to start with would not really fit with this approach.

Two ways to go might be:
1) from the individual-level results, only keep ROIs that are common across subjects.
2) map the group-level ROIs to each subject and use those for tracking/netcorring.

--pt
Subject Author Posted

Different number of ROI's per subject FATCAT

sondosayyash June 06, 2018 01:11PM

Re: Different number of ROI's per subject FATCAT

ptaylor June 06, 2018 01:30PM

Re: Different number of ROI's per subject FATCAT

sondosayyash June 12, 2018 07:41PM

Re: Different number of ROI's per subject FATCAT

ptaylor June 12, 2018 09:51PM