AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
July 25, 2018 05:58AM
Hi Rick,

Ok, I understand, thanks for your explanation.

The collinaerity is high between the regressors related to the "q" and "c" events.
For the regressors during the "o" event there's a medium collinearity only with the motor regressor (see below).

Am I correct in assuming that the results for the "o" regressors are more solid and can be trusted?
Interestingly for those regressor I do find similarities between the results using GAMMA and TENT functions.(see attachments)

One last question regarding the graph of the iresp file. The TENT function I used included 12 seconds.
My regressor duration is 3 seconds. I should expect the first third of the graph (0-3 seconds) to reflect the time course related to the regressor. Correct? Or should I "shift" the expected response according to hemodynamic lag?

Thank you!
Irene



++ Smallest FDR q [0 Full_Fstat] = 6.1433e-14
++ Smallest FDR q [2 Q_other#0_Tstat] = 0.0301622
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [4 Q_other#1_Tstat] = 0.538132 ==> few true single voxel detections
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [6 Q_other#2_Tstat] = 0.458426 ==> few true single voxel detections
++ Smallest FDR q [8 Q_other#3_Tstat] = 0.0521005
++ Smallest FDR q [10 Q_other#4_Tstat] = 0.0152592
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [12 Q_other#5_Tstat] = 0.322586 ==> few true single voxel detections
++ Smallest FDR q [14 Q_other#6_Tstat] = 0.00761529
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [15 Q_other_Fstat] = 0.334435 ==> few true single voxel detections
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [17 Q_self#0_Tstat] = 0.999789 ==> few true single voxel detections
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [19 Q_self#1_Tstat] = 0.231243 ==> few true single voxel detections
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [21 Q_self#2_Tstat] = 0.879093 ==> few true single voxel detections
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [23 Q_self#3_Tstat] = 0.103693 ==> few true single voxel detections
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [25 Q_self#4_Tstat] = 0.128768 ==> few true single voxel detections
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [27 Q_self#5_Tstat] = 0.250597 ==> few true single voxel detections
++ Smallest FDR q [29 Q_self#6_Tstat] = 0.0291363
++ Smallest FDR q [30 Q_self_Fstat] = 0.0609256
++ Smallest FDR q [32 C_other#0_Tstat] = 0.0361373
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [34 C_other#1_Tstat] = 0.468286 ==> few true single voxel detections
++ Smallest FDR q [36 C_other#2_Tstat] = 0.050969
++ Smallest FDR q [38 C_other#3_Tstat] = 0.0113919
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [40 C_other#4_Tstat] = 0.287053 ==> few true single voxel detections
++ Smallest FDR q [42 C_other#5_Tstat] = 0.00321686
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [44 C_other#6_Tstat] = 0.457179 ==> few true single voxel detections
++ Smallest FDR q [45 C_other_Fstat] = 0.072442
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [47 C_self#0_Tstat] = 0.999884 ==> few true single voxel detections
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [49 C_self#1_Tstat] = 0.917802 ==> few true single voxel detections
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [51 C_self#2_Tstat] = 0.103763 ==> few true single voxel detections
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [53 C_self#3_Tstat] = 0.134289 ==> few true single voxel detections
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [55 C_self#4_Tstat] = 0.266174 ==> few true single voxel detections
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [57 C_self#5_Tstat] = 0.941616 ==> few true single voxel detections
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [59 C_self#6_Tstat] = 0.885314 ==> few true single voxel detections
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [60 C_self_Fstat] = 0.999862 ==> few true single voxel detections
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [62 O_other_dwn#0_Tstat] = 0.999884 ==> few true single voxel detections
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [64 O_other_dwn#1_Tstat] = 0.497898 ==> few true single voxel detections
++ Smallest FDR q [66 O_other_dwn#2_Tstat] = 8.9075e-06
++ Smallest FDR q [68 O_other_dwn#3_Tstat] = 2.77526e-07
++ Smallest FDR q [70 O_other_dwn#4_Tstat] = 9.4016e-05
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [72 O_other_dwn#5_Tstat] = 0.999636 ==> few true single voxel detections
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [74 O_other_dwn#6_Tstat] = 0.834283 ==> few true single voxel detections
++ Smallest FDR q [75 O_other_dwn_Fstat] = 2.81112e-06
++ Smallest FDR q [77 O_other_up#0_Tstat] = 0.0228593
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [79 O_other_up#1_Tstat] = 0.367025 ==> few true single voxel detections
++ Smallest FDR q [81 O_other_up#2_Tstat] = 1.68745e-05
++ Smallest FDR q [83 O_other_up#3_Tstat] = 2.86516e-07
++ Smallest FDR q [85 O_other_up#4_Tstat] = 0.00029191
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [87 O_other_up#5_Tstat] = 0.674601 ==> few true single voxel detections
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [89 O_other_up#6_Tstat] = 0.841764 ==> few true single voxel detections
++ Smallest FDR q [90 O_other_up_Fstat] = 9.01099e-06
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [92 O_self_dwn#0_Tstat] = 0.579646 ==> few true single voxel detections
++ Smallest FDR q [94 O_self_dwn#1_Tstat] = 0.0994747
++ Smallest FDR q [96 O_self_dwn#2_Tstat] = 0.000646114
++ Smallest FDR q [98 O_self_dwn#3_Tstat] = 8.15666e-05
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [100 O_self_dwn#4_Tstat] = 0.287892 ==> few true single voxel detections
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [102 O_self_dwn#5_Tstat] = 0.971845 ==> few true single voxel detections
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [104 O_self_dwn#6_Tstat] = 0.995507 ==> few true single voxel detections
++ Smallest FDR q [105 O_self_dwn_Fstat] = 2.82982e-05
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [107 O_self_up#0_Tstat] = 0.690033 ==> few true single voxel detections
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [109 O_self_up#1_Tstat] = 0.121032 ==> few true single voxel detections
++ Smallest FDR q [111 O_self_up#2_Tstat] = 0.00201695
++ Smallest FDR q [113 O_self_up#3_Tstat] = 0.000798469
++ Smallest FDR q [115 O_self_up#4_Tstat] = 0.0559347
++ Smallest FDR q [117 O_self_up#5_Tstat] = 0.0632829
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [119 O_self_up#6_Tstat] = 0.999896 ==> few true single voxel detections
++ Smallest FDR q [120 O_self_up_Fstat] = 5.45198e-06
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [122 motor#0_Tstat] = 0.367716 ==> few true single voxel detections
++ Smallest FDR q [124 motor#1_Tstat] = 0.0298197
++ Smallest FDR q [126 motor#2_Tstat] = 0.00228571
++ Smallest FDR q [128 motor#3_Tstat] = 0.00241847
++ Smallest FDR q [130 motor#4_Tstat] = 0.0842148
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [132 motor#5_Tstat] = 0.812234 ==> few true single voxel detections
*+ WARNING: Smallest FDR q [134 motor#6_Tstat] = 0.579016 ==> few true single voxel detections
++ Smallest FDR q [135 motor_Fstat] = 0.0531847

Warnings regarding Correlation Matrix: X.xmat.1D
severity correlation cosine regressor pair
-------- ----------- ------
----------------------------------------
high: 1.000 1.000 (10 vs. 23) Q_other#2 vs.C_other#1
high: 1.000 1.000 (11 vs. 24) Q_other#3 vs.C_other#2
high: 1.000 1.000 (12 vs. 25) Q_other#4 vs.C_other#3
high: 1.000 1.000 (13 vs. 26) Q_other#5 vs.C_other#4
high: 1.000 1.000 (20 vs. 33) Q_self#5 vs.C_self#4
high: 1.000 1.000 (19 vs. 32) Q_self#4 vs.C_self#3
high: 1.000 1.000 (18 vs. 31) Q_self#3 vs.C_self#2
high: 1.000 1.000 (17 vs. 30) Q_self#2 vs.C_self#1
high: 0.814 0.825 (22 vs. 65) C_other#0 vs.motor#1
high: 0.781 0.797 (27 vs. 70) C_other#5 vs.motor#6
high: 0.744 0.764 (14 vs. 69) Q_other#6 vs.motor#5
high: 0.732 0.752 ( 9 vs. 64) Q_other#1 vs.motor#0
high: 0.731 0.752 (14 vs. 27) Q_other#6 vs.C_other#5
high: 0.730 0.765 (26 vs. 69) C_other#4 vs.motor#5
high: 0.730 0.765 (25 vs. 68) C_other#3 vs.motor#4
high: 0.730 0.765 (24 vs. 67) C_other#2 vs.motor#3
high: 0.730 0.765 (23 vs. 66) C_other#1 vs.motor#2
high: 0.720 0.756 (13 vs. 69) Q_other#5 vs.motor#5
high: 0.720 0.756 (12 vs. 68) Q_other#4 vs.motor#4
high: 0.720 0.756 (11 vs. 67) Q_other#3 vs.motor#3
high: 0.720 0.756 (10 vs. 66) Q_other#2 vs.motor#2
high: 0.720 0.756 ( 9 vs. 65) Q_other#1 vs.motor#1
medium: 0.693 0.717 (21 vs. 34) Q_self#6 vs.C_self#5
medium: 0.624 0.673 (13 vs. 68) Q_other#5 vs.motor#4
medium: 0.624 0.673 (12 vs. 67) Q_other#4 vs.motor#3
medium: 0.624 0.673 (11 vs. 66) Q_other#3 vs.motor#2
medium: 0.624 0.673 (10 vs. 65) Q_other#2 vs.motor#1
medium: 0.622 0.652 (16 vs. 29) Q_self#1 vs.C_self#0
medium: 0.618 0.648 ( 9 vs. 22) Q_other#1 vs.C_other#0
medium: 0.617 0.649 ( 9 vs. 35) Q_other#1 vs.C_self#6
medium: 0.614 0.664 (27 vs. 69) C_other#5 vs.motor#5
medium: 0.614 0.664 (26 vs. 68) C_other#4 vs.motor#4
medium: 0.614 0.664 (25 vs. 67) C_other#3 vs.motor#3
medium: 0.614 0.664 (24 vs. 66) C_other#2 vs.motor#2
medium: 0.614 0.664 (23 vs. 65) C_other#1 vs.motor#1
medium: 0.603 0.642 (39 vs. 69) O_other_dwn#3 vs.motor#5
medium: 0.603 0.642 (38 vs. 68) O_other_dwn#2 vs.motor#4
medium: 0.603 0.642 (37 vs. 67) O_other_dwn#1 vs.motor#3
medium: 0.594 0.634 (30 vs. 41) C_self#1 vs.O_other_dwn#5
medium: 0.592 0.632 (17 vs. 41) Q_self#2 vs.O_other_dwn#5
medium: 0.592 0.632 (16 vs. 40) Q_self#1 vs.O_other_dwn#4
medium: 0.581 0.613 (14 vs. 39) Q_other#6 vs.O_other_dwn#3
medium: 0.579 0.611 (28 vs. 40) C_other#6 vs.O_other_dwn#4
medium: 0.564 0.602 (16 vs. 28) Q_self#1 vs.C_other#6
medium: 0.557 0.595 (35 vs. 65) C_self#6 vs.motor#1
medium: 0.544 0.590 (12 vs. 37) Q_other#4 vs.O_other_dwn#1
medium: 0.544 0.590 (13 vs. 38) Q_other#5 vs.O_other_dwn#2
medium: 0.539 0.585 (25 vs. 37) C_other#3 vs.O_other_dwn#1
medium: 0.539 0.585 (26 vs. 38) C_other#4 vs.O_other_dwn#2
medium: 0.539 0.585 (27 vs. 39) C_other#5 vs.O_other_dwn#3
medium: 0.525 0.565 (15 vs. 69) Q_self#0 vs.motor#5
medium: 0.524 0.554 ( 8 vs. 60) Q_other#0 vs.O_self_up#3
medium: 0.524 0.554 (22 vs. 61) C_other#0 vs.O_self_up#4
medium: 0.516 0.547 (21 vs. 53) Q_self#6 vs.O_self_dwn#3
medium: 0.515 0.555 ( 8 vs. 34) Q_other#0 vs.C_self#5
medium: 0.513 0.554 (62 vs. 66) O_self_up#5 vs.motor#2
medium: 0.513 0.554 (61 vs. 65) O_self_up#4 vs.motor#1
medium: 0.512 0.553 (15 vs. 27) Q_self#0 vs.C_other#5
medium: 0.496 0.518 (18 vs. 50) Q_self#3 vs.O_self_dwn#0
medium: 0.494 0.515 (31 vs. 50) C_self#2 vs.O_self_dwn#0
medium: 0.493 0.536 (20 vs. 52) Q_self#5 vs.O_self_dwn#2
medium: 0.493 0.536 (19 vs. 51) Q_self#4 vs.O_self_dwn#1
medium: 0.490 0.523 (35 vs. 54) C_self#6 vs.O_self_dwn#4
medium: 0.488 0.531 (34 vs. 53) C_self#5 vs.O_self_dwn#3
medium: 0.488 0.531 (33 vs. 52) C_self#4 vs.O_self_dwn#2
medium: 0.488 0.531 (32 vs. 51) C_self#3 vs.O_self_dwn#1
medium: 0.486 0.530 (19 vs. 58) Q_self#4 vs.O_self_up#1
medium: 0.486 0.530 (20 vs. 59) Q_self#5 vs.O_self_up#2
medium: 0.480 0.525 (32 vs. 58) C_self#3 vs.O_self_up#1
medium: 0.480 0.525 (33 vs. 59) C_self#4 vs.O_self_up#2
medium: 0.480 0.525 (34 vs. 60) C_self#5 vs.O_self_up#3
medium: 0.479 0.512 ( 8 vs. 21) Q_other#0 vs.Q_self#6
medium: 0.476 0.507 (11 vs. 36) Q_other#3 vs.O_other_dwn#0
medium: 0.475 0.506 (24 vs. 36) C_other#2 vs.O_other_dwn#0
medium: 0.470 0.501 (36 vs. 66) O_other_dwn#0 vs.motor#2
medium: 0.461 0.489 (18 vs. 57) Q_self#3 vs.O_self_up#0
medium: 0.457 0.486 (31 vs. 57) C_self#2 vs.O_self_up#0
medium: 0.457 0.495 (44 vs. 67) O_other_up#1 vs.motor#3
medium: 0.457 0.495 (45 vs. 68) O_other_up#2 vs.motor#4
medium: 0.457 0.495 (46 vs. 69) O_other_up#3 vs.motor#5
medium: 0.453 0.488 (22 vs. 35) C_other#0 vs.C_self#6
medium: 0.451 0.487 (35 vs. 61) C_self#6 vs.O_self_up#4
medium: 0.447 0.495 (23 vs. 62) C_other#1 vs.O_self_up#5
medium: 0.444 0.492 (10 vs. 62) Q_other#2 vs.O_self_up#5
medium: 0.444 0.492 ( 9 vs. 61) Q_other#1 vs.O_self_up#4
medium: 0.439 0.470 (47 vs. 70) O_other_up#4 vs.motor#6
medium: 0.436 0.473 (28 vs. 29) C_other#6 vs.C_self#0
medium: 0.427 0.465 (21 vs. 60) Q_self#6 vs.O_self_up#3
medium: 0.425 0.500 (16 vs. 27) Q_self#1 vs.C_other#5
medium: 0.419 0.461 (15 vs. 39) Q_self#0 vs.O_other_dwn#3
medium: 0.417 0.468 (10 vs. 55) Q_other#2 vs.O_self_dwn#5
medium: 0.417 0.468 ( 9 vs. 54) Q_other#1 vs.O_self_dwn#4
medium: 0.416 0.466 (23 vs. 55) C_other#1 vs.O_self_dwn#5
medium: 0.411 0.471 (27 vs. 40) C_other#5 vs.O_other_dwn#4
medium: 0.411 0.471 (26 vs. 39) C_other#4 vs.O_other_dwn#3
medium: 0.411 0.471 (25 vs. 38) C_other#3 vs.O_other_dwn#2
medium: 0.411 0.471 (24 vs. 37) C_other#2 vs.O_other_dwn#1
medium: 0.410 0.449 (14 vs. 15) Q_other#6 vs.Q_self#0
medium: 0.404 0.465 (13 vs. 39) Q_other#5 vs.O_other_dwn#3
medium: 0.404 0.465 (12 vs. 38) Q_other#4 vs.O_other_dwn#2
medium: 0.404 0.465 (11 vs. 37) Q_other#3 vs.O_other_dwn#1
medium: 0.402 0.440 (54 vs. 64) O_self_dwn#4 vs.motor#0
medium: 0.400 0.433 (36 vs. 37) O_other_dwn#0 vs.O_other_dwn#1
Attachments:
open | download - 1.png (496.5 KB)
open | download - 2.png (455.7 KB)
Subject Author Posted

TENT results not consistent with GAMMA results Attachments

irepe June 14, 2018 04:34AM

Re: TENT results not consistent with GAMMA results

gang June 14, 2018 04:54PM

Re: TENT results not consistent with GAMMA results Attachments

irepe June 15, 2018 06:24AM

Re: TENT results not consistent with GAMMA results

rick reynolds June 15, 2018 01:55PM

Re: TENT results not consistent with GAMMA results

irepe July 19, 2018 08:18AM

Re: TENT results not consistent with GAMMA results

rick reynolds July 20, 2018 09:04AM

Re: TENT results not consistent with GAMMA results

irepe July 24, 2018 04:14AM

Re: TENT results not consistent with GAMMA results

rick reynolds July 24, 2018 01:24PM

Re: TENT results not consistent with GAMMA results Attachments

irepe July 25, 2018 05:58AM

Re: TENT results not consistent with GAMMA results

rick reynolds July 25, 2018 10:58AM

Re: TENT results not consistent with GAMMA results

irepe July 30, 2018 03:08AM