Re: I should have set FWHM=8mm, however, the default afni

charujing123

September 27, 2018 11:00PM

Registered: 10 years ago
Posts: 94

Hi
Thanks for your kind help. Running the fmri data using afni_proc.py is time intensive. Furthermore, I have too many subjects. I want to do follow steps, but I donot know which afni code can help me:
1, using FWHM=8mm, and generating results.
2,using results of 1 as master, then apply fwhm=4mm results to this master.
thanks.

Reply Quote

RSS

Subject	Author	Posted
I should have set FWHM=8mm, however, the default afni_proc.py was 4mm	charujing123	September 27, 2018 05:10AM
Re: I should have set FWHM=8mm, however, the default afni_proc.py was 4mm	Peter Molfese	September 27, 2018 09:24AM
Re: I should have set FWHM=8mm, however, the default afni_proc.py was 4mm	charujing123	September 27, 2018 11:00PM
Re: I should have set FWHM=8mm, however, the default afni_proc.py was 4mm	Peter Molfese	October 01, 2018 12:29PM
Re: I should have set FWHM=8mm, however, the default afni_proc.py was 4mm	Daniel Glen	October 01, 2018 01:56PM

I should have set FWHM=8mm, however, the default afni_proc.py was 4mm

Re: I should have set FWHM=8mm, however, the default afni_proc.py was 4mm

Re: I should have set FWHM=8mm, however, the default afni_proc.py was 4mm

Re: I should have set FWHM=8mm, however, the default afni_proc.py was 4mm

Re: I should have set FWHM=8mm, however, the default afni_proc.py was 4mm