AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
October 02, 2018 04:24PM
When I do group analysis based on six individual subject's results using 3dDeconvolve, the uncorrected p value should always set over 0.05 so we can see the activation. The q value is always close to 1 like 0.98, 0.99.. Is uncorrected p value 0.05 enough to say our results significant? Do we need to care about the q value? Is there anyway to lower the q value to make our results more sense?
Subject Author Posted

Question about 3ddtest+ and the q value of group results

ranjit October 02, 2018 04:24PM

Re: Question about 3ddtest+ and the q value of group results

Peter Molfese October 03, 2018 11:49AM

Re: Question about 3ddtest+ and the q value of group results

m.houston81 October 18, 2018 09:31AM

Re: Question about 3ddtest+ and the q value of group results

Peter Molfese October 18, 2018 11:01AM