AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
October 18, 2018 04:04PM
You are right - all the spatial transformations will change the acquisition time of the voxel. It's fairly tricky to follow all the spatial transformations altogether. Concatenating all the transformations and applying all of them together as we do with align_epi_anat.py and afni_proc.py would be the most correct way. Interpolation is still an important point because if you have higher resolution in voxels that cross between two acquisition times, averaging is probably not the best thing to do, but nearest neighbors aren't exactly right either. Larger voxels than the original definitely blend times too, so there's no really good solution for that. In the end, I think few if any go through the trouble of tracking times across all the processing pipeline. If it's done at all, slice timing correction is done at the beginning of most pre-processing pipelines.
Subject Author Posted

How to know the acquisition time of the voxels in an ROI?

He Chen October 14, 2018 05:43AM

Re: How to know the acquisition time of the voxels in an ROI?

Daniel Glen October 15, 2018 07:41PM

Re: How to know the acquisition time of the voxels in an ROI?

He Chen October 18, 2018 03:36PM

Re: How to know the acquisition time of the voxels in an ROI?

Daniel Glen October 18, 2018 04:04PM