AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
February 21, 2019 06:09AM
Thank you both Gang and Daniel, I think I'll stick with the surface-based approach.

One tiny question: Does it make sense to mapping the group analysis results that are totally from volume world to surface rendering, just for showing the cortex contrasts?

Like, select the statistical results from method 1 as the overlay, and open suma, have the spec and sv as the group average, does it make sense?
Subject Author Posted

t-value higher in surface computation than volume computation

Liu Mengxing February 19, 2019 12:23PM

Re: t-value higher in surface computation than volume computation

gang February 20, 2019 12:30PM

Re: t-value higher in surface computation than volume computation

Daniel Glen February 20, 2019 08:27PM

Re: t-value higher in surface computation than volume computation

Liu Mengxing February 21, 2019 06:09AM

Re: t-value higher in surface computation than volume computation

Daniel Glen February 21, 2019 04:46PM