AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
September 27, 2019 04:11AM
Hi Rick,

Thanks for the recommendations. I think there is not a problem with DICOM files in this case. Indeed, the information is the same if I compare the runs which did not have the motion problem with the ones with the motion problem. What can I do to handle this issue? I know that motion in general is a real problem and evidence shows that it can be mitigated until some point (doing alignment and regressing the motion parameters). But, this case is quite special since just one parameter is importantly higher than the orders. Are there any options to solve this?

Karel
Subject Author Posted

Strange motion parameter Attachments

Karelo September 24, 2019 12:12PM

Re: Strange motion parameter

rick reynolds September 24, 2019 01:57PM

Re: Strange motion parameter Attachments

Karelo September 25, 2019 05:21AM

Re: Strange motion parameter

rick reynolds September 25, 2019 08:39AM

Re: Strange motion parameter

Karelo September 25, 2019 12:06PM

Re: Strange motion parameter

rick reynolds September 25, 2019 05:06PM

Re: Strange motion parameter

Karelo September 27, 2019 04:11AM