AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

Previous Message Next Message
Message List New Topic Print View
|
rick reynolds
November 05, 2019 08:49PM
Hi Priya,

That stats.$subj+tlrc dataset should be from 3dDeconvolve, while the _REML version is from 3dREMLfit, so it does look like you already have those results.

If the -regress_reml_exec option is removed, that program should not be run. However, 3dDeconvolve still says how to run it, showing a sample command. Though without that option, I expect there is no stats*_REML dataset, because the command was not actually run.

- rick
Reply Quote
RSS
Subject Author Posted

Analysis using afni proc.py but no REML

pkalra November 03, 2019 12:02PM

Re: Analysis using afni proc.py but no REML

rick reynolds November 03, 2019 07:53PM

Re: Analysis using afni proc.py but no REML

pkalra November 04, 2019 01:54PM

Re: Analysis using afni proc.py but no REML

rick reynolds November 05, 2019 08:49PM

Re: Analysis using afni proc.py but no REML

storrisi November 08, 2019 02:21PM

Re: Analysis using afni proc.py but no REML

rick reynolds November 08, 2019 05:36PM