Hi, Louis-

I have sent it. For the benefit of possible future readers of this, I will include much of that text here, including the commands to re-run the APQC.

-----------------------------------------------
To regenerate the APQC (afni_proc.py quality control) output, you can re-run the steps that the proc.* script created by afni_proc.py uses; based on the command you copy+pasted, I think the following will do it (the only part you would have to change would be the value of the "subj" variable at the top, but I think you called your subj ID "test"), in a script I called "do_redo_apqc.tcsh" on my computer:

#!/bin/tcsh    

set subj  = test

set thedate = `date +%Y_%m_%d_%H_%M_%S`


if ( -e QC_${subj} ) then
    \mv QC_${subj} QC_${subj}_pre_${thedate} 
endif

apqc_make_tcsh.py                               \
    -review_style  basic                        \
    -subj_dir      .                            \
    -uvar_json     out.ss_review_uvars.json
  
tcsh @ss_review_html |& tee out.review_html_${thedate}

apqc_make_html.py -qc_dir QC_${subj}

So, you can put do_redo_apqc.tcsh into your "results" directory where afni_proc.py output all your results, and run:

tcsh do_redo_apqc.tcsh

and that should do it.

Note: if you have Python installed on your computer and the "matplotlib" module installed on it, you can run a nicer version of the QC output in "pythonic" style (instead of the default "basic" style). I would strongly recommend having that, as it is a lot nicer and more informative. To have this nicer QC output from afni_proc.py, include the following in your command:
-html_review_style pythonic
(and make sure you have Python with matplotlib). If you want to have the nicer output in your current run, you can change the word "basic" in line 13 of the attached do_redo_apqc.tcsh to be "pythonic", and run the file in the same way as above.

More about the APQC is described here:
[afni.nimh.nih.gov]
... although there are even newer features that I have to update on the webpage descriptions (such as checking in the "warnings" about too much censoring-- the very change that I made while introducing the current bug...).

--pt