AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
June 16, 2020 01:01PM
Could you show the contingency table about Task and Gender? You can find it on the terminal when you run your 3dLME script.

I actually do not see this. The output includes:

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
***** Summary information of data structure *****
107 subjects : 10170 10181 10183 10185 10186 10187 10190 10192 10193 10194 10196 10198 10200 10201 10202 10203 10205 10211 10213 10215 10216 10217 10219 10220 10221 10223 10224 10225 10226 10228 10230 10232 10234 10235 10237 10239 10240 10241 10242 10243 10244 10245 10246 10247 10249 10250 10251 10253 10254 10258 10260 10261 10262 10264 10267 10270 10271 10272 10274 10275 10276 10278 10279 10282 10283 10286 10287 10289 10290 10291 10292 10294 10295 10297 10298 10300 10301 10302 10303 10304 10306 10307 10310 10311 10312 10313 10314 10315 10316 10318 10319 10320 10321 10324 10326 10328 10329 10330 10335 10338 10339 10340 10341 10342 10343 10344 10345
642 response values
6 levels for factor Task : dynface efnback1 efnback2 rest reward1 reward2
***
9 post hoc tests

Contingency tables of subject distributions among the categorical variables:


Tabulation of subjects against all categorical variables
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Subj vs Task:

dynface efnback1 efnback2 rest reward1 reward2
10170 1 1 1 1 1 1
10181 1 1 1 1 1 1
10183 1 1 1 1 1 1
10185 1 1 1 1 1 1
10186 1 1 1 1 1 1
***
So it seems that there is a space for contingency tables amongst variables, but that output is blank... unless I am not looking in the right place?


The empty space after the positive (+) and negative sign (-) should be removed in your original script:

And right, this is the error that I previously noticed, and had already corrected to get the program to run to this point.
Subject Author Posted

3dLME - Incorrect level coding in variable

dani2 June 13, 2020 03:22PM

Re: 3dLME - Incorrect level coding in variable

gang June 13, 2020 04:49PM

Re: 3dLME - Incorrect level coding in variable

dani2 June 14, 2020 01:11PM

Re: 3dLME - Incorrect level coding in variable

dani2 June 14, 2020 01:19PM

Re: 3dLME - Incorrect level coding in variable

gang June 14, 2020 05:06PM

Re: 3dLME - Incorrect level coding in variable

dani2 June 15, 2020 09:50PM

Re: 3dLME - Incorrect level coding in variable

dani2 June 16, 2020 11:26AM

Re: 3dLME - Incorrect level coding in variable

gang June 16, 2020 12:40PM

Re: 3dLME - Incorrect level coding in variable

dani2 June 16, 2020 01:01PM

Re: 3dLME - Incorrect level coding in variable

dani2 June 17, 2020 10:45AM