History of AFNI updates  

|
July 30, 2020 10:31AM
Hi Regan,

Thanks for the data. It looks possible that the t to z conversion might have precision difficulty for large t-stats.

However the main problem is more simple than that. You have doubled the degrees of freedom in the commands, since the input is specified as:

-setA shellgame_*_belvthink_resampled*

But these files are .HEAD and .BRIK *pairs*. The input should be specified as:

-setA shellgame_*_belvthink_resampled*.HEAD

That will cut the DoF in half, and lead to more reasonable results.

- rick
Subject Author Posted

Anomalistic z-scores

rbernhard June 29, 2020 12:20PM

Re: Anomalistic z-scores

Daniel Glen July 02, 2020 01:06PM

Re: Anomalistic z-scores

rbernhard July 03, 2020 02:29PM

Re: Anomalistic z-scores

rbernhard July 05, 2020 02:05PM

Re: Anomalistic z-scores

Daniel Glen July 07, 2020 06:10PM

Re: Anomalistic z-scores

rbernhard July 10, 2020 03:30PM

Re: Anomalistic z-scores

RWCox July 14, 2020 10:10AM

Re: Anomalistic z-scores

rick reynolds July 14, 2020 11:19AM

Re: Anomalistic z-scores

rbernhard July 14, 2020 02:14PM

Re: Anomalistic z-scores

rick reynolds July 30, 2020 10:31AM