AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
September 10, 2021 02:22PM
Hello Gang,

I am revisiting the discussion of the question above. The 3dDeconvolve is pasted at the end of the post. For the amplitude modulation, there are 2 behavioral measures that were associated with each TR (RT and confidence). Above there are 24 sub-bricks associated with one glt condition. I was wondering which sub-bricks represents the "intercept" that corresponds to the condition effect when the modulatory variable is adjusted at its center value? Meaning, that the condition effect has therefore has been controlled for, for the behavioral variables? In addition, within the 3dDeconvolve command, does the gltlsym flag automatically use intercept sub-bricks to create the glt? As an example, I am currently using coefficients generated from glt_label 9 as input to the population level and assumed it represented the condition effect when the modulatory variable is adjusted at its center value. Is this correct?

As a follow-up to that, we are also interested in the slope effects, the modulation of the two behavioral variables. Specifically, we would like to look at the modulation of each variable separately so that we generate a brain map of only RT modulation and a second brain map of only confidence modulation. Is this possible? If so, how would we go about separating these effects?

Thank you,
Catherine



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 09/10/2021 02:25PM by Catherine Tallman.
Subject Author Posted

Interpreting amplitude modulated output

Catherine Tallman December 17, 2020 12:42PM

Re: Interpreting amplitude modulated output

gang December 18, 2020 10:38AM

Re: Interpreting amplitude modulated output

Catherine Tallman December 18, 2020 12:18PM

Re: Interpreting amplitude modulated output

gang December 20, 2020 07:51PM

Re: Interpreting amplitude modulated output

Catherine Tallman December 21, 2020 03:30PM

Re: Interpreting amplitude modulated output

Catherine Tallman September 10, 2021 02:22PM

Re: Interpreting amplitude modulated output

rick reynolds September 10, 2021 08:49PM

Re: Interpreting amplitude modulated output

Catherine Tallman September 15, 2021 01:07PM

Re: Interpreting amplitude modulated output

rick reynolds September 17, 2021 05:16PM