AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

Previous Message Next Message
Message List New Topic Print View
|
duodenum
January 03, 2021 01:35AM
Hello dear AFNI gurus;

After I batch preprocessed my data (usual for subj in bla-bla) using afni_proc.py and running the scripts generated by it, I realized an unusual problem. When I looked at the QC files, the information about motion was same across ALL subjects.

Quote

motion limit : 0.3
num TRs above mot limit : 7
average motion (per TR) : 0.103047
max motion displacement : 1.41946
average outlier frac (TR) : 0.00366303

It was the same with @ss_review_basic and @ss_review_driver. Other values look fine, TSNR, GCOR etc. they are different. errts files are different. How can all 63 subjects have the same average motion? I used the same script for a different group of subjects a few weeks ago and it was fine then. What am I missing?

Thanks,
Yasir
Reply Quote
RSS
Subject Author Posted

A weird problem regarding quality controls

duodenum January 03, 2021 01:35AM

Re: A weird problem regarding quality controls

duodenum January 03, 2021 01:53AM