It is correct that [0] and [1] are the mean of arctanh(correlation) and the Z-statistic/score of how far that mean is from 0.
However, it is not true that [2] is "the mean of correlation" -- it is the tanh(mean of arctanh(correlation)) -- which is somewhat different.
For example, take 3 values = 0.3, 0.6, 0.9, whose mean is obviously 0.6. However, the following calculation (using AFNI's ccalc program) gives 0.677762 instead: