AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
October 31, 2021 03:13PM
Hi Gang,

You are right, now for SPMG1 I have only one regression coefficient for I and B and two for S (and for SPMG2 I have only two regression coefficient for I and B and four for S).

So in this case, if I still want to see the contrast between the S regressor and I/B regressors considering the parametric modulation effect, what will be an appropriate approach?

1. for SPMG1: I should do S[1] - I[0] OR will be better to do S[1]-I[1] including the parametric modulation for the regressor I too (by using the same parametric modulation value which is used for the S regressor, since both regressors - S and I - are composing the same trial from the run for the subject, just the task of I and S regressor is different)? Also, should I consider the S[1] - B[0] OR will be better to do S[1]-B[1] including the parametric modulation for the regressor B too (again, using the same parametric modulation value which is used for S regressor)?

2. for SPMG2: I should do S[2]-I[0] and S[3]-I[1] OR will be better to do S[2]-I[2] and S[3]-I[3] including the parametric modulation for the regressor I too, like for SPMG1? Also, should I consider the S[2]-B[0] and S[3]-B[1] OR will be better to do S[2]-B[2] and S[3]-B[3] including the parametric modulation for the regressor B too, like above?

Thanks in advance for your precious answers!

Ruben.
Subject Author Posted

Order of the sub-briks saved from SPMG1/2 functions with parametric/amplitude modulation.

ruben.nechifor October 20, 2021 04:24PM

Re: Order of the sub-briks saved from SPMG1/2 functions with parametric/amplitude modulation.

gang October 21, 2021 11:09AM

Re: Order of the sub-briks saved from SPMG1/2 functions with parametric/amplitude modulation.

ruben.nechifor October 27, 2021 07:31AM

Re: Order of the sub-briks saved from SPMG1/2 functions with parametric/amplitude modulation.

gang October 28, 2021 04:10PM

Re: Order of the sub-briks saved from SPMG1/2 functions with parametric/amplitude modulation.

ruben.nechifor October 29, 2021 10:01AM

Re: Order of the sub-briks saved from SPMG1/2 functions with parametric/amplitude modulation.

gang October 30, 2021 06:19PM

Re: Order of the sub-briks saved from SPMG1/2 functions with parametric/amplitude modulation.

ruben.nechifor October 31, 2021 03:13PM

Re: Order of the sub-briks saved from SPMG1/2 functions with parametric/amplitude modulation.

gang November 01, 2021 11:16AM

Re: Order of the sub-briks saved from SPMG1/2 functions with parametric/amplitude modulation.

ruben.nechifor November 01, 2021 12:59PM

Re: Order of the sub-briks saved from SPMG1/2 functions with parametric/amplitude modulation.

gang November 01, 2021 01:25PM

Re: Order of the sub-briks saved from SPMG1/2 functions with parametric/amplitude modulation.

ruben.nechifor November 02, 2021 06:11AM

Re: Order of the sub-briks saved from SPMG1/2 functions with parametric/amplitude modulation.

gang November 03, 2021 10:36PM