AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
January 31, 2022 07:55PM
Hi Robin,

That is right, we are not experts in SPM... :)

Indeed, the duration parameters are not allowed to be zero. Maybe just as a precaution, I'm not sure.

There is no difference between dmBLOCK with a 0.6 s event and BLOCK(0.6). There is a slight difference with BLOCK(0.6,1) in that is scales to unit height. Without that, a duration under 1s will tend to scale to a maximum of around that duration. So with a small duration, the ",1" is usually preferable.

But anyway, a small scalar effect will not alter any statistics, even at the group level. It should just scale all such betas uniformly.

I would expect any of GAM, SPMG1, BLOCK(0.6,1) or BLOCK(0.1,1) would be reasonable.

If you want to match very closely, SPMG1 might the basis function applied in SPM. There might also be differences in modeling drift. If you want to tell afni_proc.py to use sinusoids, that is an option, too.

- rick
Subject Author Posted

afniproc for amplitude modulation

Robin January 26, 2022 04:16AM

Re: afniproc for amplitude modulation

Robin January 31, 2022 06:52AM

Re: afniproc for amplitude modulation

rick reynolds January 31, 2022 10:59AM

Re: afniproc for amplitude modulation

Robin January 31, 2022 05:59PM

Re: afniproc for amplitude modulation

rick reynolds January 31, 2022 07:55PM