AFNI Message Board

Dear AFNI users-

We are very pleased to announce that the new AFNI Message Board framework is up! Please join us at:

https://discuss.afni.nimh.nih.gov

Existing user accounts have been migrated, so returning users can login by requesting a password reset. New users can create accounts, as well, through a standard account creation process. Please note that these setup emails might initially go to spam folders (esp. for NIH users!), so please check those locations in the beginning.

The current Message Board discussion threads have been migrated to the new framework. The current Message Board will remain visible, but read-only, for a little while.

Sincerely, AFNI HQ

History of AFNI updates  

|
November 22, 2002 01:07PM

Hello Lukas:

As I see it, there are basically two operating modes for 3dDeconvolve:

1) Multiple linear regression -- Use program 3dDeconvolve to model the fMRI
signal as a linear sum of the input stimulus functions. In this case, you
might want to "preconvolve" the experimental input binary sequence(s) with
the assumed shape for the hemodynamic response (say, a gamma variate function),
using program waver. This is then used as the input stimulus function for
program 3dDeconvolve. (You might want to use the "-peak" option of waver, to
keep the amplitudes reasonble.) Also, in this case, you would normally set
the 3dDeconvolve maxlag = 0.

2) Deconvolution -- Use program 3dDeconvolve to estimate the hemodynamic
response (aka, IRF) for each of the input stimuli. In this case, the input
stimulus functions should usually be the "raw" binary sequences. That is,
the binary sequence(s) should NOT be preconvolved with the assumed hemodynamic
response, since you are attempting to estimate the hemodynamic response (IRF).
So, no waver. Also, you should set maxlag > 0.


The multiple linear regression approach is usually more appropriate for
block type designs. The deconvolution approach is usually more appropriate
for event related designs.

There are probably exceptions to all of the above statements.

Doug Ward
Subject Author Posted

Estimating the IRF

Lukas Pezawas November 20, 2002 01:49PM

Re: Estimating the IRF

B. Douglas Ward November 22, 2002 01:07PM

Re: Estimating the IRF

Lukas Pezawas November 22, 2002 01:16PM

Re: a few more questions...

Lukas Pezawas November 22, 2002 03:11PM

Re: a few more questions...

B. Douglas Ward November 22, 2002 04:29PM

Re: a few more questions...

Lukas Pezawas November 22, 2002 08:44PM

Re: Estimating the IRF

teodora December 01, 2004 02:44PM